Prioritisation Mapping of Vulnerable Districts of India Based on Multi-Criteria Analysis of Some Selected Parameters

Authors

  • S. N. Nandy HARSAC, CCS Haryana Agricultural University Campus, Hisar - 125004, Haryana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25175/jrd/2025/v44/i1/173303

Keywords:

Climate Variability, Degree of Vulnerability, Fuzzy Set, Membership Function, Vulnerability Ranking

Abstract

The vulnerability of a region can be assessed through multiple criteria such as environmental degradation, climatic variability, population dynamics, economic development, etc. The consequential assessment of vulnerability of a state or country is generally represented by index, rank, level, class or category. Often, one index is not comparable with another in terms of scale/variability; diverse cross-sectional analysis is required to sum up, as the vulnerability of a region is not the consequence of any single parameter. A multi-criteria assessment has been attempted in the present paper using the membership function of a Fuzzy set, instead of a crisp index/ranking. The available data of two broad categories, viz., geospatial parameters like sensitivity, adaptive capacity, exposure, bio-physical and livelihood-based indicators, etc., and socio-economic parameters like poverty, backwardness index, population density, GDP, etc., have been used for the analysis. The indices of these parameters are normalised to a common scale, and compound vulnerability has been derived through fuzzy operators/ expressions. A district is treated as ‘vulnerable’ either geo-spatially or socio-economically, as per the derived fuzzy rule-based inferences. Spatial distribution of vulnerable districts across the states/regions of India has been depicted using a GIS tool. As many as 195 districts across the country have been found high to critically vulnerable and need to be prioritised to minimise its adversity. It is alarming that two-thirds of critically vulnerable districts fall in Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Jharkhand. The Fuzzy logic approach is not used for highly quantitative empirical data, but for analysing ambiguous and conflicting viewpoints. The paper has attempted to derive a collective vulnerability from multiple indices using fuzzy rule.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anaokar, G. S., & Khambete, A. K. (2016). Application of fuzzy logic in environmental engineering for determination of air quality index. International Journal of Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Sciences, 4(2), 109–116.

Bakshi, S., Chawla, A., & Shah, M. (2015). Regional disparities in India—A moving frontier. Economic & Political Weekly, 50(1), 44–52.

Baucic, M. (2020). Household level vulnerability analysis—Index and fuzzy based methods. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(4), 263. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9040263

Department of Science and Technology (DST). (2021). Climate vulnerability assessment for the Indian Himalayan Region using a common framework (p. 144). Government of India.

Eierdanz, F., Alcamo, J., Acosta-Michlik, L., Kromker, D., & Tänzler, D. (2008). Using fuzzy set theory to address the uncertainty of susceptibility to drought. Regional Environmental Change, 8(4), 197–205.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2001). Climate change 2001: Impact, adaptation and vulnerability (Third Assessment Report of IPCC, p. 1032). Cambridge University Press.

Khan, S. A., Kumar, S., Hussain, M. Z., & Kalra, N. (2009). Climate change, climate variability and Indian agriculture: Impacts vulnerability and adaptation strategies. In S. N. Singh (Ed.), Climate Change and Crops (pp. 19–38). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88246-6_2

Nandy, S. N. (2021). Analysis of drought vulnerability indices of Indian districts using fuzzy logic approach. IWRA (India) Journal, 10(2), 11–17.

Rama Rao, C. A., Raju, B. M. K., Subba Rao, A. V. M., Rao, K. V., Rao, V. U. M., Kausalya Ramachandran, Venkateswarlu, B., & Sikka, A. K. (2013). Atlas on vulnerability of Indian agriculture to climate change (p. 116). Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture.

Uddameri, V. (2005). A review of fuzzy set theoretic approaches and their applications in environmental practice. In E. J. Calabrese, P. T. Kostecki, & J. Dragun (Eds.), Contaminated soils, sediments and water (pp. 501–515). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23079-3_33

Published

2025-08-19

How to Cite

Nandy, S. N. (2025). Prioritisation Mapping of Vulnerable Districts of India Based on Multi-Criteria Analysis of Some Selected Parameters. Journal of Rural Development, 44(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.25175/jrd/2025/v44/i1/173303

Issue

Section

Research Papers

Similar Articles

<< < 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.